The short answer
The reconciliation law signed July 4, 2025 expanded 529 plans to cover eight categories of K–12 expenses, including curriculum, books, online materials, tutoring, exam fees, and educational therapies, for distributions made after that date (P.L. 119-21). The annual cap is $20,000 per beneficiary starting with tax year 2026 (26 U.S.C. §529, amount retrieved August 2026); it stayed at $10,000 through the end of 2025 (Chase). The statute still ties every category to a public, private, or religious school, and the word “homeschool” appears nowhere in it (§529); the IRS has not said how the new rules apply to home education (Legal Clarity). Thirteen states do not treat K–12 withdrawals as qualified at the state level, so the same withdrawal can be federally tax-free and state-taxed at once (Savingforcollege.com).
What changed
Section 70413 of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, Public Law 119-21, signed July 4, 2025, is titled “Additional expenses treated as qualified higher education expenses for purposes of 529 accounts” (P.L. 119-21). Behind the bureaucratic title sits a broad expansion of what a 529 can pay for below the college level. The expanded expense list applies to distributions made after the date of enactment, which is why plan sponsors describe the new categories as usable from July 5, 2025 onward (26 U.S.C. §529 effective-date notes).
Some history explains why homeschool families are reading the fine print. In the 2017 tax law, Senator Cruz’s amendment adding both K–12 tuition and homeschool expenses to 529 plans passed with the Vice President’s tiebreaking vote, but Senators Sanders and Wyden successfully challenged the homeschool portion under the Byrd Rule, and it was stripped from the final law (House Republican Policy Committee). Tuition survived; the explicit homeschool language did not. The 2025 expansion broadens what a 529 can buy below the college level without adding the word “homeschool” back, which is the root of the gray area this guide covers.
The eight expense categories
Amended Section 529(c)(7) now lists eight K–12 categories, each “in connection with enrollment or attendance at, or for students enrolled at or attending, an elementary or secondary public, private, or religious school” (26 U.S.C. §529(c)(7)). The categories, per subsections (A) through (H):
- tuition;
- curriculum and curricular materials;
- books or other instructional materials;
- online educational materials;
- tutoring, with provider restrictions described below;
- fees for “a nationally standardized norm-referenced achievement test, an advanced placement examination, or any examinations related to college or university admission” (§529(c)(7)(F));
- dual-enrollment fees; and
- educational therapies for students with disabilities (§529(c)(7)).
Two categories carry licensed-provider rules. Tutoring qualifies only when provided outside the home, a tutoring facility counts, by a tutor who is not related to the student and who is a state-licensed teacher, has taught at an eligible educational institution, or is a subject-matter expert in the relevant field (my529). Educational therapies qualify only for students with disabilities and only when delivered by a licensed or accredited practitioner (§529(c)(7)(H)). What counts as a subject-matter expert is not yet defined; tax educators note that detailed Treasury guidance on the tutoring-provider standards is still expected (Western CPE).
A companion provision, Section 70414, also made recognized postsecondary credentialing expenses 529-qualified for distributions after July 4, 2025: tuition, fees, books, and exam fees for workforce, military, and state-licensed credential programs (my529). For a homeschool graduate headed to a trade rather than a four-year campus, the same account now covers that path.
The $20,000 cap and its timing
The K–12 distribution limit in Section 529(e)(3)(A) is $20,000 per beneficiary per taxable year, effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2025, which means tax year 2026 (26 U.S.C. §529, amount retrieved August 2026). The timing produced an odd first half-year: for all of 2025 the cap remained $10,000 even though the expanded expense list took effect July 5, 2025; the $20,000 cap began January 1, 2026 (Chase, retrieved August 2026).
The cap aggregates across accounts. The statute counts distributions “from all qualified tuition programs” with respect to a beneficiary “in the aggregate,” so two accounts for the same child cannot double the limit (§529(e)(3)(A)). The IRS’s tax year 2026 inflation-adjustment release expressly incorporates the OBBBA amendments, but the agency had not published a dedicated rewrite of its K–12 guidance in Publication 970 as of August 2026 (IRS).
The homeschool question
Every category above runs through the same gatekeeper: the expense must be “in connection with enrollment or attendance at, or for students enrolled at or attending, an elementary or secondary public, private, or religious school.” The word “homeschool” does not appear anywhere in Section 529 (26 U.S.C. §529). Congress wrote curriculum, tutoring, and testing into the statute; it did not say whose.
Readings diverge from there. Legal analysts describe the practical result as a gray area: “the statutory gatekeeper language still points back to a school,” so independent homeschoolers must argue their program is connected to a qualifying school (Legal Clarity). Tax-professional commentary reads the same text the other way. Western CPE writes that homeschooling families “now benefit directly from the expanded list of qualified expenses,” citing roughly 4 million homeschooled students (Western CPE), and advocacy outlets characterized the overhaul as a deliberate boost for homeschool families, listing curriculum, testing, tutoring, and therapies as newly reachable (Independent Women’s Forum), a positioning claim rather than a tax authority.
The strongest version of the pro-homeschool argument runs through state law. In states that classify homeschools as private schools, Texas by case law, California through the private school affidavit, North Carolina as a category of nonpublic school, families “may have a stronger argument” that their expenses are in connection with a private school, but “this theory has not been tested in IRS enforcement actions” (Legal Clarity). How each state classifies home education is catalogued in the state homeschool laws guide. The IRS, for its part, “has not issued specific guidance on how the new K–12 categories apply to homeschooling,” and that remained true as of August 2026 (Legal Clarity).
Congress wrote a list of expenses that reads like a homeschool budget, attached it to a school-enrollment condition, and has not said which reading wins. Both sides of that argument are currently untested.
The downside of guessing wrong is quantifiable. If the IRS treats a withdrawal as non-qualified, the earnings portion is subject to ordinary income tax plus a 10 percent additional federal tax, plus any state add-ons, such as California’s extra 2.5 percent (Tax Shark).
Two categories are structurally hard for independent homeschoolers regardless of how the school-connection question resolves. Tutoring must occur outside the home, from an unrelated and credentialed tutor, so a homeschooling parent can never be the paid tutor, and dual-enrollment fees run through an institution of higher education (Tax Shark). Curriculum, books, online materials, and exam fees are the categories that map most cleanly onto homeschool spending, and they are exactly the ones waiting on IRS guidance.
The state conformity problem
A 529 withdrawal has two tax lives, federal and state, and the second does not automatically follow the first. Savingforcollege.com’s conformity tracker, updated January 5, 2026, reports that twenty states fully conform to federal 529 tax law, and lists thirteen, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, and Vermont, as not recognizing K–12 withdrawals as qualified (Savingforcollege.com, retrieved August 2026). In those states a withdrawal the IRS blesses can still trigger state income tax on the earnings and clawback of any state deduction previously claimed. The rows below reflect what each state’s own plan or revenue agency discloses, where such a disclosure exists.
| Status | States | What the sources say |
|---|---|---|
| Decoupled, verified against plan or state sources | California, New York, Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota, Colorado, Nebraska | California taxes earnings plus an additional 2.5% state tax (ScholarShare FAQ). New York discloses deduction recapture plus NY tax on earnings, and its tax department “has not yet determined” whether the expanded OBBBA categories are NY-qualified (NY’s 529 Direct Plan). Illinois warns of state tax, deduction recapture, and penalties (Bright Start FAQ). Michigan recaptures its deduction and taxes earnings (MESP FAQ). Minnesota runs a dedicated recapture tax (MN Dept. of Revenue). Colorado’s plan states its 529s are tax-free only for higher education (CollegeInvest). Nebraska treats K–12 as non-qualified today but has enacted a flip to qualified status on January 1, 2029 (NEST 529). All retrieved August 2026. |
| Decoupled, per the tracker only | Connecticut, Hawaii, Montana, New Mexico, Oregon, Vermont | Listed as non-conforming by the January 2026 tracker but not independently verified against a plan or state agency page. Oregon’s recapture of its credit or deduction rests on the tracker; a post-OBBBA confirmation from an oregon.gov page was not located. Montana adds a distinct rule: distributions within 3 years of account opening are taxed at the state’s highest marginal rate (Savingforcollege.com, retrieved August 2026). |
| Conforming, state-tax-free but no contribution deduction | North Carolina, Delaware, Kentucky, New Hampshire, Tennessee | K–12 withdrawals get state-tax-free treatment, and the state offers no contribution deduction to recapture (Savingforcollege.com, article dated January 9, 2026). |
| No wage income tax, conformity moot | Alaska, Florida, Nevada, South Dakota, Texas, Washington, Wyoming | With no state wage income tax, only the federal rules matter for K–12 withdrawals (Savingforcollege.com). |
One more wrinkle sits inside the conforming column. A state that long ago conformed on K–12 tuition has not necessarily adopted the new categories: “States may take time to adopt the expanded K–12 expense categories (tutoring, curriculum materials, etc.) that became federally qualified on July 4, 2025” (Savingforcollege.com). Tuition conformity and expanded-expense conformity are separate questions, and a family planning a curriculum withdrawal should check its own plan’s disclosures for the second one.
Receipts, timing, and the 1099-Q
The mechanics are simple to state and easy to get wrong. Distributions must be taken in the same calendar year the qualified expense is paid; the IRS matches Form 1099-Q totals against expenses incurred January 1 through December 31, and a mismatch can make the earnings taxable plus the 10 percent penalty (Savingforcollege.com). A December curriculum order reimbursed in January is a problem.
The plan administrator reports every distribution on Form 1099-Q regardless of how the money was spent. No receipts are submitted with the return; the burden falls on the taxpayer to reconcile 1099-Q totals to qualified expenses if questioned (Invest529 fact sheet). For the new categories that means itemized receipts, curriculum invoices, and documentation of a tutor’s credentials: “Without receipts and proof of a tutor’s credentials, you cannot defend a qualified distribution if the IRS questions your Form 1099-Q” (Tax Shark). Advisor retention advice ranges from three years to seven.
Families using the dual-enrollment category should note one coordination rule: amounts claimed toward the American Opportunity or Lifetime Learning credits must be subtracted from the expenses a 529 distribution can cover, under Publication 970’s coordination rules (Savingforcollege.com).
Deduction stacking and superfunding
In most states that offer a 529 deduction or credit, nothing requires the money to sit in the account. A family can contribute, claim the state benefit, and withdraw for K–12 expenses almost immediately; the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy describes taxpayers who “contribute to a 529 plan, immediately take a qualified distribution... and qualify for the state income tax benefit” (ITEP). The account becomes a pass-through that converts ordinary school spending into a state tax break.
Whether the play works depends entirely on the conformity table above. In recapture states, Illinois, New York, Michigan, Minnesota, Oregon, Colorado, Nebraska, a K–12 withdrawal claws the deduction back, so the same move backfires (Savingforcollege.com). Four states structurally block or limit the in-and-out route even apart from conformity: Montana taxes distributions within three years of account opening at the top rate, Wisconsin adds back contributions deducted and then distributed within 365 days, and Michigan and Minnesota compute the benefit on contributions net of distributions (ITEP). Where it does work, the numbers are real: Missouri allows a deduction up to $8,000, or $16,000 married filing jointly, and accepts contributions to any state’s plan (Savingforcollege.com), and Indiana offers a 20 percent state income tax credit on 529 contributions (IN DOR Information Bulletin 98). Amounts retrieved August 2026.
On the funding side, the 2026 annual gift-tax exclusion is $19,000 per donor per recipient, unchanged from 2025 (Rev. Proc. 2025-32, amount retrieved August 2026). Section 529(c)(2)(B) lets a donor contribute five times that at once, $95,000 per donor or $190,000 per married couple in 2026, and elect to treat the gift as made ratably over five years (Savingforcollege.com). The election is made on IRS Form 709 filed by April 15 of the following year even though no gift tax is due (Savingforcollege.com), and additional gifts to the same beneficiary during the five-year window draw down the donor’s lifetime exemption, $15,000,000 for 2026 (IRS).
How this fits with other programs
A 529 is the family’s own money with a tax wrapper, which distinguishes it from the other funding streams covered on this site. The federal tax-credit scholarship arriving in 2027 is a different program answering the same family-money question: donated funds routed through scholarship organizations, with its own homeschool-eligibility hinge, covered in the federal tax-credit scholarship guide. State education savings accounts are public funds under state rules, catalogued in the ESA-by-state guide. And whether a $20,000 annual cap is even a binding constraint depends on what a family actually spends; typical budgets are documented in the homeschool cost guide.
The honest summary as of August 2026: the federal expense list now fits homeschool spending better than it ever has, the cap doubled, and the two questions that decide whether a given family can use any of it, the school-connection reading and state conformity, both remain open in much of the country. Families should confirm how these rules apply to their own situation with a tax professional or their state revenue agency before withdrawing.
Every Monday
A new dispatch, published here.
Curriculum reviews, ESA changes, state-law updates, and plain-English coverage of the research that matters. Reader-supported. Always open. No paywall, no email list.